3/10/2006 - Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements
OF ELECTIONS.
[Cite as State ex rel. Kuhar v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections,
___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2006-Ohio-1079.]
Mandamus — Elections — Constitutionality of R.C. 1901.31 —
Challenging constitutionality of legislation through mandamus
is generally prohibited — Mandamus claim is manifestly a claim
for prohibitory injunction and declaratory judgment — Court lacks
jurisdiction — Cause dismissed.
(No. 2006-0328 ─ Submitted March 6, 2006 ─ Decided March 10, 2006.)
IN MANDAMUS.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS
2006-0386. State ex rel. Koncelik v. Hastings.
In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing
of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of the
joint application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal
is granted.
Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
MEDIATION REFERRALS
The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
2006-0445. RX Bedford Investors, LLC v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-R-2564.
2006-0448. RX Bedford Investors, LLC v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-R-2509.
2006-0456. Charter Steel-Cleveland, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-V-538.
Later

