Ohio Law

News and Announcements from the Supreme Court of Ohio and Other Governmental Entities Within the Buckeye State.

Monday, May 22, 2006

5/22/2006 - Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-2385. State v. Copeland.
Butler App. No. CA2003-12-320, 2005-Ohio-5899. This cause is pending before
the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On December 10,
2005, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the
court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed
consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas
appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a
conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the
court of appeals' order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to
consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
III(6).

DISCIPLINARY CASES

2005-0382. Richland Cty. Bar Assn. v. Akers.
On application for reinstatement of Eric J. Akers, Attorney Registration No.
0019706. Application granted and respondent reinstated to the practice of law in
Ohio.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSAL

2005-2052. State v. Heyman.
Sandusky App. No. S-04-016, 2005-Ohio-5565 and 2005-Ohio-6244. This cause
is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records
of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of
jurisdiction, due December 1, 2005, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the
Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite
diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.

Later


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home