Ohio Law

News and Announcements from the Supreme Court of Ohio and Other Governmental Entities Within the Buckeye State.

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

2/28/2006 - Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-0586. State v. Drummond.
Mahoning C.P. No. 03CR358. This cause is pending before the court
as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas for Mahoning
County. Upon consideration of appellee's motion to participate in
oral argument,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

2005-2119. State v. Gibson.
Ross App. No. 04CA2805, 2005-Ohio-5273. This cause is pending
before the court as a discretionary appeal. On November 10, 2005,
appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending
in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court
stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal.
Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of
appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals' order
certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within
fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to
consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R.
III(6).

2005-2122. State v. Crace.
Ross App. No. 04CA2801, 2005-Ohio-5274. This cause is pending
before the court as a discretionary appeal. On November 10, 2005,
appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending
in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this
court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in
this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court
that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as
provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of
appeals' order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause
within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should
not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal
pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(6).

2005-2125. White v. Summit Cty.
Summit App. No. 22398, 2005-Ohio-5192. This cause is pending
before the court as a discretionary appeal. On November 10, 2005,
appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending
in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this
court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in
this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court
that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as
provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of
appeals' order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by
S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause
within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should
not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal
pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(6).

2006-0328. State ex rel. Kuhar v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a
complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election
matter. Upon consideration of the motion of Ohio Attorney General
im Petro for leave to intervene,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted.
Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
2006-0311. State ex rel. Bailey v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 05AP-316.

Later

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home