Ohio Law

News and Announcements from the Supreme Court of Ohio and Other Governmental Entities Within the Buckeye State.

Friday, January 06, 2006

1/5/2006 - Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements and Administratve Actions

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2002-2032. State v. Brinkley.
Lucas C.P. No. CR00-2826. This cause came on for further consideration of
appellee's amended motion to set execution date. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

2004-0001. Academy of Medicine of Cincinnati v. Aetna Health, Inc.
Hamilton App. Nos. C-030109, C-030110, and C-030111, 155 Ohio App.3d 310,
2003-Ohio-6194. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the
Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. On October 7, 2005, appellees and
appellant Community Insurance Company filed a joint notice of proposed
settlement. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the parties are to show cause,
within ten days of the date of this entry, why the appeal of Community Insurance
Company should not be dismissed.

2004-1974. In re Estate of Mason.
Hancock App. No. 5-04-01, 2004-Ohio-5644. This cause is pending before this
court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hancock
County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of appellee/cross-appellee and
appellee/cross-appellant for divided argument time,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that oral argument
scheduled for January 10, 2006, shall proceed as follows: Appellant/crossappellee's
case-in-chief; appellee/cross-appellant's case-in-chief; appellee/crossappellee's
argument in response to the appeal and cross-appeal; appellant/crossappellee's
rebuttal, if any; appellee/cross-appellant's rebuttal, if any.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall be allotted fifteen minutes
of argument time.

2005-0331. Whitaker v. M.T. Automotive, Inc.
Summit App. No. 21836, 2004-Ohio-7166. This cause is pending before the court
as an appeal from the Court of Appeals of Summit County. Upon consideration of
the motion of amicus curiae National Association of Consumer Advocates to
participate in oral argument in support of appellant,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted, and amicus curiae
shall share the time allotted to appellant.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-0392. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Util. Comm.
Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-880-EL-UNC. This cause is pending before
the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon
consideration of appellant's application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted.
Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

2005-0832. Raub v. Garwood.
Summit App. No. 22210, 2005-Ohio-1279. This cause is pending before the court
as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of
the joint application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted.
Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

2005-1925. Nationwide Safe T Propane, Inc. v. Pub. Util. Comm.
Public Utilities Commission, No. 03-1412-TR-CVF. This cause is pending before
the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission. Upon consideration
of appellee's motion to dismiss,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted. Accordingly, this
cause is dismissed.

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

On December 2, 2005, the following attorneys were suspended from the
practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. VI(6)(B) for failing to file their 2005/2007
Certificate of Registration and paying the applicable fees on or before December 1,
2005. These attorneys have applied for reinstatement, complied with the
requirements of Gov.Bar. R. VI(1), paid all applicable registration and reinstatement
fees, and have been reinstated to the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R.
VI(6)(D):

NOTE: to see the complete list of reinstated attorneys, click here and scroll down.

Later

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home