Ohio Law

News and Announcements from the Supreme Court of Ohio and Other Governmental Entities Within the Buckeye State.

Friday, December 09, 2005

12/9/2005 - Supreme Court of Ohio Case Announcements

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2003-1572. State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. This cause came on for further consideration of
appellant's motion for leave to file accompanying documents pursuant to this
court's September 24, 2004 entry and motion for leave to file motion for order
to show cause why the Bureau of Workers' Compensation has not paid
appellant's above-entitled Workers' Compensation benefits. Upon
consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are denied.

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-2008. State ex rel. Campbell v. Ruehlman.
In Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint
for a writ of procedendo. Upon consideration of relator's application for
dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is
granted.
Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

2005-2229. State ex rel. Pamer v. Slaby.
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint
for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's application for
dismissal, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal
is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

MEDIATION REFERRALS

2005-1562. Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1328. The court hereby returns this case
to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated
with case Nos. 2005-1563, 2005-1564, 2005-1565, and 2005-1566, Natl.
City Bank v. Wilkins.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine the
briefing of case Nos. 2005-1562 through 2005-1566 and file one brief for
each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. The parties shall file an original of the
brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief. Appellant shall file its merit brief
within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise
proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7),
the court may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely
file merit briefs.

2005-1563. Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1327. The court hereby returns this case
to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated
with case Nos. 2005-1562, 2005-1564, 2005-1565, and 2005-1566,
Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine the
briefing of case Nos. 2005-1562 through 2005-1566 and file one brief for
each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. The parties shall file an original of the
brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief. Appellant shall file its merit brief
within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise proceed
in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7), the court
may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely file merit
briefs.

2005-1564. Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1329. The court hereby returns this case
to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated
with case Nos. 2005-1562, 2005-1563, 2005-1565, and 2005-1566, Natl.
City Bank v. Wilkins.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine the
briefing of case Nos. 2005-1562 through 2005-1566 and file one brief for
each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. The parties shall file an original of the
brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief. Appellant shall file its merit brief
within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise
proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7),
the court may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to
timely file merit briefs.

2005-1565. Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1326. The court hereby returns this case
to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated
with case Nos. 2005-1562, 2005-1563, 2005-1564, and 2005-1566, Natl.
City Bank v. Wilkins.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine the
briefing of case Nos. 2005-1562 through 2005-1566 and file one brief for
each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. The parties shall file an original of the
brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief. Appellant shall file its merit brief
within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise proceed
in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7), the court
may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely file merit
briefs.

2005-1566. Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1330. The court hereby returns this case
to the regular docket under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated
with case Nos. 2005-1562, 2005-1563, 2005-1564, and 2005-1565, Natl.
City Bank v. Wilkins.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the parties shall combine the
briefing of case Nos. 2005-1562 through 2005-1566 and file one brief for
each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. The parties shall file an original of
the brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief. Appellant shall file its merit
brief within 40 days of the date of this entry and the parties shall otherwise
proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI. As provided in S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(7),
the court may dismiss this case or take other action if the parties fail to timely
file merit briefs.

The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to
S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
2005-2116. State ex rel. Ward v. Dorman Prod.
Franklin App. No. 05AP-28, 2005-Ohio-5425.
2005-2133. State ex rel. Englemon v. Queen City Barrel Co.
Franklin App. No. 05AP-46, 2005-Ohio-5651.
2005-2135. State ex rel. Lange v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-1330, 2005-Ohio-5487.

Later

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home